One Australian company has prevented staff from using the technology, others are scrambling for suggestions on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are advising care.
But others have actually welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, calling for Australia to follow China's lead in developing effective yet less energy-intensive AI innovation.
In the days because the Chinese company introduced its R1 synthetic intelligence model and openly launched its chatbot and app, it has actually upended the AI market.
- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Several global market leaders saw their market worths drop after the launch, as DeepSeek showed AI might be developed using a fraction of the expense and processing required to train models such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.
Its arrival might signify a new market shift, but for federal government and service, the impact is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught governments and organizations by surprise as personnel began to check out the new AI technology, a minimum of for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.
Business as normal
A spokesperson for Telstra said the business had "a strenuous procedure to evaluate all AI tools, abilities, and use cases in our company", including a list of approved generative AI tools, and standards on how to utilize them.
For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not approved and its usage is not motivated (although it's not officially blocked).
"Our favored partner is MS Copilot, and we're rolling out 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our employees."
Other business sought immediate guidance on whether DeepSeek must be adopted.
Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Mansted, stated clients had already approached the company for advice on whether the innovation was safe.
"That's not a surprise, due to the fact that it appears the whole world has actually remained in a little a DeepSeek craze - both the economically and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.
DeepSeek and government
CyberCX today took the uncommon action of rapidly providing advice recommending organisations, including government departments and those storing delicate details, strongly think about restricting access to DeepSeek on work gadgets.
"We know that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We have actually been down this road previously," Mansted said. "We have actually had disputes about TikTok, about Chinese security cams, about Huawei in the telco network, and we constantly act after the truth, not before the reality ... Here, especially due to the fact that the hazards are around compromise of delicate information, in regards to any information that you take into this AI assistant: it's going directly to China.
"We thought we required to act quicker this time."
Under federal AI policy carried out in September 2024, companies have till the end of February 2025 to release transparency documents about their use of AI.
But understanding who makes decisions on the specific usage of DeepSeek in the federal government has actually shown challenging. The attorney general's department, that made the choice to ban TikTok utilize on federal government gadgets, referred inquiries to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.
Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not supply a response by the time of publication.
Familiar arguments ...
Some of the reaction in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have actually been calls to ban the technology, in the middle of issue over how the Chinese government might access user information - an echo of the days Huawei was banned from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more recently, of the dispute over banning TikTok.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China government, stated today that Australia "can not continue the present method of reacting to each brand-new tech development". It required a tech method covering AI that consisted of investing in sovereign AI capabilities.
The market minister, Ed Husic, stated on Tuesday it was too early to decide on whether DeepSeek was a security risk.
Register to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
"If there is anything that presents a risk in the nationwide interest, we will always keep an open mind and view what happens. I believe it's too early to leap to conclusions on that," he stated. "But, ai once again, yogicentral.science if we need to act, then accountable federal governments do."
He worried that Australia is "in the last stages" of preparing its action and would develop its own regulative settings.
"The US is flagging their technique. The EU has theirs. Canada also will have a different approach. And our regional partners also are taking a look at this," he said.
1
As DeepSeek Upends the aI Industry, one Group is Urging Australia to Embrace The Opportunity
Antonia Walls edited this page 2025-02-03 18:36:35 +08:00